Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Rev. bras. ciênc. mov ; 16(3): 1-19, jan.-mar. 2008. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-727521

ABSTRACT

Experiências nacionais e internacionais apontam que barreiras pessoais (BP) e ambientais (BA) interferem no estilo de vida ativo. Objetivo: comparar as BA e BP em adolescentes de ambos os sexos residentes em região metropolitana (RM-Santo André) e interiorana (RI-São Bento do Sapucaí) do Estado de São Paulo. Métodos: Avaliamos 198 adolescentes: 98 residentes em RM e 100 em RI com média de idade (15,6 + 0,7 (RM) e 16,0 + 1,6 anos (RI). Os avaliados responderam o questionário do Programa Agita São Paulo (2006), sobre BA e BP. As BA e BP foram analisadas pelos critérios: nunca interferem (1); (2) raramente; (3) algumas vezes; (4) freqüentemente; (5) quase sempre interferem. As respostas a BA e BP dos adolescentes foram agrupadas em três categorias: raramente interferem (1+2) (RR), algumas vezes (3) (AV) e frequentemente (4+5) (FR) . O teste Qui-quadrado foi utilizado para comparação das proporções com nível de significância de p<0,05. Resultados: Adolescentes AT da RM citaram falta de equipamento (68,7%) e diversão em se exercitar (85,8%) como as BA mais freqüentes. Na RI falta de local (45,7%) e companhia (41,3%) como BA. Nas BP os AT apresentaram falta de conhecimento como se exercitar (64,6%) e falta de tempo (58,9%). Na RI falta de tempo (51,5%) e de conhecimento como se exercitar (32,1%). Grupos IA da RM mostraram falta de energia (38,8%) e autodisciplina (46,9%) e na RI falta de interesse (34,5%) e de energia (44,6%). Conclusão: fatores culturais podem interferir similarmente nas BA e distintamente nas BP em adolescentes.


National and international experiences show that personal (PB) and environmental barriers (EB) interfere on lifestyle. Purpose: analyze the EB e PB in both sexes adolescents living at metropolitan region (MR – Santo André) and countryside (CR – São Bento do Sapucaí) in São Paulo State. Methods: 198 adolescents were evaluated: 98 from MR and 100 CR, with mean of age (15.6 + 0.7 (MR) and 16.0 + 1.6 years old (CR). The subjects answered the Agita São Paulo Survey (2006), about EB and PB. The EB and PB were analyzed by never interfere (1); (2) rarely; (3) sometimes; (4) frequently; (5) always interfere criteria. We set the answers on 1+2; 3 e 4+5. The physical activity level was shared in insufficient (IA) and active (AT) and Chii-square test (p<.05) as statistics analysis. The analysis was determined by frequently criteria. Results: AT Adolescents from MR reported lack of equipment (68.7%) and fun to exercise (85.8%) as the most important EB. Adolescents from CR presented lack of place (45.7%) and friendship (41.3%) as EB. PB the AT presented lack of knowledge how to exercise (64.6%) and lack of time (58.9%). Lack of time was reported by 51.5% from CR and lack of knowledge to exercise in (32.1%). The groups IA from MR showed lack of energy (38.8%) and self-discipline (46.9%) and from CR lack of interest (34.5%) and energy (44.6%). Conclusion: cultural factors may contribute to similar results in EB and differently on PB for adolescents’ subjects.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adolescent , Motor Activity , Social Problems , Cultural Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL